Rubric for Judging

RUBRIC FOR JUDGING:

Criteria	3 pts	2 pts	1 pt	Rate
Attractiveness	The poster will catch the attention of most viewers. It is exceptionally attractive in terms of color scheme, design and layout	The poster will catch the attention of some viewers. More time could have gone into selection of color scheme and the planning of design and layout.	The poster is poorly designed and unattractive. As a result, it will not stand out from competing visual stimuli.
Relevance	The poster clearly communicates the idea of the MDG, as well as the solutions and means to achieve the MDG.	The poster communicates the idea of MDG but there it only shows little solutions to achieve the MDG.	The poster communicates the idea of MDG but there are ideas presented which are not relevant.
Graphics – Clarity	All images can easily be identified from 2m away	½ to ¾ of the images can be easily identified from 2m away.	Only ¼ of the images can be easily identified from 2 m away.
Graphics – Originality	Several of the graphics used on the poster reflect an exceptional degree of student creativity in their creation and display.	One or two of the graphics used on the poster reflect student creativity in their creation and display.	All of the graphics are found in the work of someone else. However, some student creativity is demonstrated in the display.
Technicality	Follows the poster specifications	There are 1-2 guidelines not followed	There are 3 or more guidelines not followed
Overall Presentation	Demonstrates strong knowledge of the MDG	Demonstrates some knowledge of the MDG	Did not demonstrate knowledge of the project and is confusing.
			TOTAL

            ***The decision of the judges shall be considered final and irrevocable.

            *** A group of tabulators shall finalize the scores of each participating entry.